- Visibility 329 Views
- Downloads 13 Downloads
- DOI 10.18231/j.achr.2020.010
-
CrossMark
- Citation
Histopathologic study of Mucinous lesions of the appendix
- Author Details:
-
Ch Geetha *
-
Asra Farheen
-
A K Deshpande
Introduction
Mucinous lesions of appendix are rare and account for 0 .2 – 0.7% of all appendicetomy surgeries.[5], [4], [3], [2], [1] T hey are complex, diverse group of epithelial neoplasms ranging from simple mucoceles to complex pseudomyxoma peritonei. In 1842, Rokitansky first described mucocele as a dilatation of the appendiceal lumen by an abnormal mucus accumulation.[6] Morphologically mucocele refers to cystic dilatation of appendix due to accumulation of gelationous material.
Mucoceles of appendix are divided into four types based on histology: (1) simple retention cysts, (2) mucosal hyperplasia, (3) mucinous adenoma, and (4) mucinous adenocarcinoma.[1] The clinical presentation is nonspecific abdominal pain and sometimes as acute appendicitis because of localised inflammation. Mostly clinical presentation is rather non-specific making preoperative diagnosis rare. Histopathology is very crucial for diagnosis and categorisation of mucinous lesions.
In this study, we evaulated clinical, radiological and histopathological findings of all the mucinous lesions of appendix.
Materials and Methods
It is a retrospective study carried out at KAMSRC from 2013 to 2017 over a period of five years. It included ten cases of mucinous lesions of appendix. Clinical details and radiological findings were retrieved from case sheets.
All the specimens are collected in 10% neutral buffered formalin (NBF). Gross examination findings are noted in all the cases and the sections are taken accordingly. Sections are stained with Hematoxylin & Eosin (H&E). Special stain for mucin was done with AB-PAS as and when required. Diagnosis and classification is based on WHO 2010[7] and recommendations in the AJCC 8th edition.[8]
Results
Mucinous lesions of appendix are rare and accounted for 0.8% of all the appendicetomy specimends. Benign lesions include simple mucoceles or retention cysts and benign neoplastic adenomas. Malignant lesions include invasive adenocarcinomas.
Benign lesions are more common than malignant lesions and account for 50% of all lesions. All the benign lesions are seen in females at a younger age in contrast to malignant lesions which are seen in males at an older age.
All the patients presented with clinical features of appendicitis (4 cases), pain abdomen (4 cases), abdominal pain and mass (2 cases)
Simple Mucocele (Retention cyst) are seen in 2/10 cases. One case was seen in 26 years female who presented with chronic appendicitis and underwent interval appendicectomy. Other case is seen in 35 years female with dilated appendix. Gross examination revealed dilated appendix filled with mucoid material. Histopathology showed dilated lumen filled with mucinous material, lined by single layered, flattened epithelium. There is no proliferation or atypia of the lining epithelium.
The 2010 WHO classification recognizes 3 main categories of mucinous neoplasms: mucinous adenoma, LAMN and appendiceal adenocarcinoma.[7]
Benign mucinous adenomas accounted for 33% (3/10) cases ([Figure 1]). All the cases are seen in females with mean age of 44 year. Two cases clinically presented as appendicitis and one case presented with abdominal pain. Imaging revealed dilated appendix in two cases. One case was diagnosed as mucocele on ultrasonography. Gross examination revealed dilated appendix filled with mucin. Microscopy shows appendiceal mucosa thrown into villous architecture, composed of benign columnar cells with stratification and abundant mucin and is confined to mucosa with no evidence of invasion beyond muscularis mucosa.
Low grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (LAMN); One case 1/10 of LAMN is seen in our study. It is seen in 36 years female who presented with abdominal pain and mass and ultrasound revealed dilated appendix. Gross examination revealed dilated appendix of 6x7cm. filled with mucin. Histopathology revealed w ell differentiated adenoma with acellular mucin dissecting the musclaris propria of appendix. There is flattened epithelial growth with loss of muscularis mucosae and mild fibrosis of submucosa.In our study, LAMN is associated with low grade pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) with pools of mucin and scaterred epithelial cells showing low grade cytological atpia in seperately received omental biopsy
Mucinous cystadenocarcinoma is seen in 4 cases accounting for 40 % cases ([Figure 2]). All are males with a mean age of 60 yrs. Abdominal pain is the most common symptom. Imaging findings showed perforated appendix in two case s and growth at the base of the appendix in other case, Grossly the appendix is markedly enlarged with serosal congestion in all cases and two cases revealed perforation. Microscopy is characterised by invasive neoplastic glands with high grade cellular atypia and nuclear pleomorphism and mitotic activity extending into muscularis propria.
Mucinous hyperplasia and High grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm(HAMN) are not encountered in our study
Summary of all the cases:
S. No | Age | Gender | Clinical Diagnosis | Radiology findings | Histopathology |
1 | 32 | F | Abdominal pain-Appendicitis | Dilated appendix | Benign Mucinous Adenoma |
2 | 50 | F | Abdominal pain | Dilated appendix | Benign Mucinous Adenoma |
3 | 36 | F | Abdominal pain and mass | Dilated appendix | LAMN w ith pseudomyxoma peritonei |
4 | 46 | M | Abdominal pain and mass | USG;Dilated appendix CT-growth at the base of appendix | Mucinous Adenocarcinoma |
5 | 60 | M | Abdominal pain | Dilated appendix | Mucinous Adenocarcinoma |
6 | 60 | M | Abdominal pain | Perforated appendix | Mucinous Adenocarcinoma |
7 | 61 | M | Appendicitis | Perforated appendix | Mucinous Adenocarcinoma |
8 | 26 | F | Appendicitis | Interval appendicectomy | Retention cyst (Simple mucocele) |
9 | 50 | F | Appendicitis | Dilated appendix | Benign Mucinous Adenoma |
10 | 48 | F | Pain abdomen | Dilated appendix | Retention cyst (Simple mucocele) |


Discussion;
Primary tumors of the appendix are rare and represent less than 2% of surgical appendectomy specimens[9] They include epithelial tumors, carcinoid tumors, mesenchymal tumors, lymphomas. Mucinous neoplasms of the appendix are still rare and second only to carcinoids[10]
Mucocele of the appendix can result from obstruction of appendiceal ostium due to mucus, mucuous hyperplasia, benign and malignant lesions. Other causes include fecal impaction or polyps of the cecum, inflammation from surrounding tissues[1] and rare causes found in the literature are endometriosis and metastatic melanoma.[12], [11] Presently the term mucocele is only used for the macroscopic description or for imaging and as a clinical term, never as a definitive diagnosis
Mucoceles of appendix are divided into four types based on histology: (1) simple retention cysts, (2) mucosal hyperplasia, (3) mucinous cystadenoma, and (4) mucinous cystadenocarcinoma.[1]
Simple mucoceles are retention cysts, characterised by accumulation of mucus with normal epithelial lining and rarely exceed 2 cm.[14], [13] They result from an obstructing fecolith, extrinsic compression or inflammatory conditions and rarely endometriosis.
Mucinous neoplasms of appendix include Mucinous adenoma, Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm and Mucinous adenocarcinoma. Salient features of these three entities is summarised in [Table 2]
There are no cases of Mucinous hyperplasia and High grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm in our study.
Mucinous adenoma | Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (LAMN) | Mucinous adenocarcinoma |
Confined to appendiceal mucosa | Non-invasive glands with mucin dissecting beyond the appendix | Invasive glands extending beyond the appendix |
No extra-appendiceal mucin | Acellular or cellular extra- appendiceal mucin | Invasive epithelium in the extra-appendiceal mucin |
Not associated with PMP | Associated with low-grade PMP | Associated with high-grade PMP |
PMP Benign, no recurrences | Frequent recurrences | ˂10% 10-year survival |
Parameter | Cerame MA 19 | Nitecki SS 18 | Present Study |
Age | 57.1 | 56.5 | 60 |
M:F | 1.4:1 | 1.2:1 | All are males |
Presentation as Acute appendicitis | 68% | 50% | 50% |
Perforation | 50% | - | 50% |
Mucinous lesions of appendix are rare and accounted for 0.8% (10/1200) of all the appendicectomy specimens in our study. This is in comparision to other studies where they represented 0.2 – 0.7% of all appendicetomy surgeries[5], [4], [3], [2], [1]
Benign mucinous lesions are more common than malignant lesions similar to studies by Morano et al and Higa et al[20], [1]
In our study, Male to female ratio is 2:3. This is in contrast to other studies by Carr NJ et al.[16] which showed a male predominance (5 : 2). But in comparision to a retrospective study of 135 patients by Omari et al.[10] where 55% were females
Benign and mucinous lesions as a whole are more common in females as comparable to study by Morano WF.[20] Higa et al[1]
Mucoceles and mucinous cystadenomas are seen in females and all the mucinous adeno carcinomas are seen in males. However, AM are considered to occur more frequently in women.[21] Mucinous cystadenomas have high frequency in women compared to men with a ratio of 4:1, and it tends to affect patients over 50 years of age.[6] Other tumors of the gastro intestinal tract, ovary, breast and kidney can be associated in up to one-third of the patients.[21] Omari et al. recommend surveillance colonoscopy in patients with diagnosis of neoplastic mucinous lesions of appendix.[21]
All the cases of adeno cacinoma are seen in males and in the sixth decade similar to study to Tirumani et al.[17] They have an increased association with other colonic neoplasia and chronic ulcerative colitis but such association is not seen in our study.
Mean age of presentation of mucinous cystadenoma is 44 years, mucinous cystadeno carcinoma is 56.7 years. Cystadenocarcinomas are seen at a later age than cystadenomas similar to other studies
The most common clinical presentation is nonspecific abdominal pain as seen in 60% of cases similar to study by Emre et al.[22] Abdominal pain is associated with mass in two cases. Appendicitis as clinical presentation is seen in 40% of all the cases in contrast to other studies by Omari et al[21] where only 8% to 14% of the cases presented as acute appendicitis.[21], [3] Ruiz-Tovar et al.[3] reported 14% of their patients had an intraoperative diagnosis of appendicitis with AM. Other features can be weight loss, nausea and vomiting, obstipation, and change in bowel habits. They can also present as intestinal strangulation, appendiceal intussusception, or generalised abdominal pain[5]
Mostly clinical presentation is rather non-specific making preoperative diagnosis difficult. Preo perative diagnosis is possible with the help of radiological investigations (abdominal USG, CT, or MRI) when there is cystic dilation of the appendix, mural calcification of the appendix wall, luminal diameter greater than 15mm. Macroscopic appearance of the appendix examined intraoperatively gives a clue to the diagnosis. Histopathological examination of the specimen.[25], [24], [23] enables the establishment of final diagnosis. In our study, USG was done in all the cases which revealed a dilated appendix. CT scan was done in one case of adeno carcinoma which showed growth at the base of appendix.
Simple retention cyst of appendix is non-neoplastic dilated appendix filled with mucin. There are two cases in our study.
Histopathology showed flattened lining epithelium with no atypia. Most of the benign mucoceles are asymptomatic. These are mostly detected incidentally during ultrasonography, computed tomography and other radiographic examinations of gastrointestinal tract, or during a laparotomy.[5] Simple appendectomy is the treatment of choice for simple mucoceles.
Mucinous adenomas
Adenomas show female predominance and typically occur in fifth decade but the age range is wide.1Abdominal pain that mimics acute appendicitis is the most common clinical presentation.1 It can also present as an abdominal mass or as intussusception of the appendix or can be asymptomatic.
Grossly, appendix is dilated and filled with mucin. The serosa is smooth with absent mucin.
Microscopic examination reveals tumors limited to mucosa with intact muscularis mucosae. There is no mucin dissecting into the wall or mucin extrusion outside the appendix. The tumor consists of a proliferation of mucinous epithelial cells thrown into villi.
Appendiceal adenomas are benign and are treated by appendectomy alone.
LAMN with pseudomyxoma peritoni
Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (LAMN) is a rare malignancy accounting for 1% of gastrointestinal neoplasms and is found in less than 0.3% of appendectomy specimens.[27], [26] In our study only one case is seen accounting to 0.1% of all appendicetomy specimens.
They are commonly seen in men, particularly in the sixth decade in contrast in our study where LAMN is seen in 36 years female w ho presented with abdominal pain and mass. Other symptoms include abdominal pain, intussusception, and obstruction and some times asymptomatic.
Complications of LAMN include intussusception, ureteral obstruction, volvulus, small bowel obstruction (SBO), rupture, and PMP[27], [26] In our case, it is associated with low grade PMP. PMP refers to the accumulation of mucin within the peritoneal cavity secondary to mucinous epithelial neoplasia. This most often occurs because of peritoneal spread of a mucinous neoplasm from the appendix but has been described with mucinous tumors from other sites, including colon, ovary, gallbladder, pancreas, and urachus.
Imaging modalities for diagnosis include ultrasound (USG) and CT. In our case, USG w as done which showed dilated appendix and CT scan revealed PMP.
Grossly, LAMN shows markedly dilated appendix filled with mucin. There is hyalinization and fibrosis of the appendiceal wall.[28], [27], [26] LAMNs less than two centimeters (cm) are rarely malignant. Masses larger than 6 cm have higher risk of malignant cells, a higher risk of appendiceal perforation, and development of PMP.[27]
Histopathology shows low grade atypical glandular cells and epithelial cells with “ pushing invasion ” of atypical cells creeping into the appendiceal wall with possible diverticular formation.[28] In our case, histopathology showed mucin pools and strips of cells on the serosal surface
Management of LAMN includes the prevention of rupture, seeding, and development of PMP.[27] Right hemicolectomy with or without omentectomy is recommended when there is infiltration of malignancy into submucosa or with the presence of lymph node metastasis.[29]
Mucinous adeno carcinoma
Adenocarcinomas of the appendix are rare entities, representing <0.5% of all gastrointestinal malignancies and 4-6% over lesions of the appendix neoplasm 9. Collins et al[30] found an incidence of 0.082% among 50 000 appendectomy specimens. There is an increased incidence among men in some series8,[18] but not in others.[19], [31] Patients usually present in fifth to seventh decade of life[31], [18] and us ually as acute appendicitis. Other less common modes of presentation include a palpable mass, obstruction, gastrointestinal bleeding, or symptoms.
Appendiceal adenocarcinomas are classified as adenocarcinoma not otherwise specified, mucinous adenocarcinoma, signet ring cell adenocarcinoma, and undifferentiated carcinoma. Only Mucinous adenocarcinoma are included in our study.
Invasive adenoca rcinoma of the appendix is surgically treated by right hemicolectomy and lymph node dissection, in order to stage the tumor and ensure complete resection.[19]
In our study all the cases are diagnosed on histopathology of appendicetomy specimens. Right hemicolectomy was advised in all the cases. Further follow-up details are not available.
Comparitive study of age, M :F ratio, clinical presentation of mucinous adeno carcinoma with other studies is summarised in [Table 3].
Conclusion
Mucinous lesions of appendix are rare. Mucinous lesions range from simple mucocele to mucinous adenocarcinomas. They are more common in females. Most of them present with non-specific abdominal pain making pre-operative clinical diagnosis difficult. Imaging shows dilated appendix. Intra operative gross examination gives us a clue to diagnosis. Final diagnosis is established by histopathological study of the excised specimen. Neoplasms confined to the mucosa of the appendix are adenomas, whereas neoplasms extending beyond the appendix can be LAMNs or adenocarcinomas. The treatment for simple mucocele is appendectomy. Right hemicolectomy is advised for intermediate /malignant lesions depending on the size and location. Maximum care should be taken to avoid intraperi toneal rupture of a mucocele because of the risk of PMP. Risk of developing adenocarcinoma in colon, ovary, endometrium, breast, kidney is greater in patients with a mucocele than in the general population, warranting regular cancer survillence and monitoring in these cases. Clear communication between the radiologist, pathologist and surgeon is essential for optimal patient management.
Source of funding
None.
Conflict of interest
None.
References
- E J Rosai, C A Pizzimbono, L Wise. Mucosal hyperplasia, mucinous cystadenoma, and mucinous cystadenocarcinoma of the appendix. A re-evaluation of appendiceal‘mucocele. Cancer 1973. [Google Scholar]
- Ravi Marudanayagam, Geraint T Williams, Brian I Rees. Review of the pathological results of 2660 appendicectomy specimens. J Gastroenterol 2006. [Google Scholar]
- J. Ruiz-Tovar, D. García Teruel, V. Morales Castiñeiras, A. Sanjuanbenito Dehesa, P. López Quindós, E. Martínez Molina. Mucocele of the Appendix. World J Surg 2007. [Google Scholar]
- R.M. Smeenk, M.L.F. van Velthuysen, V.J. Verwaal, F.A.N. Zoetmulder. Appendiceal neoplasms and pseudomyxoma peritonei: A population based study. Eur J Surg Oncol (EJSO) 2008. [Google Scholar]
- S Yakan, C Caliskan, A Uguz, M A Korkut, A C¸oker. A retrospective study on mucocele of the appendix presented with acute abdomen or acute appendicitis. Hong Kong J Emerg Med 2011. [Google Scholar]
- C Rokitansky. A Manual of Pathological Anatomy. A Manual of Pathological Anatomy . [Google Scholar]
- N Carr, L Sobin, F Carneiro, F T Bosman, F Carneiro, R H Hruban, N D Theise. Tumors of the appendix. World Health Organization classification of tumours 2010. [Google Scholar]
- N J Carr, T D Cecil, F Mohamed. Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International. A consensus for classification and pathologic reporting of pseudomyxoma peritonei and associated appendiceal neoplasia: the results of the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI) Modified Delphi Process. Am J Surg Pathol 2016. [Google Scholar]
- S J Connor, G B Hanna, F A Frizelle. Appendiceal tumors: retrospective clinicopathologic analysis of appendiceal tumors from 7,970 appendectomies. Dis Colon Rectum 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Perry J. Pickhardt, Angela D. Levy, Charles A. Rohrmann, Amir I. Kende. Primary Neoplasms of the Appendix: Radiologic Spectrum of Disease with Pathologic Correlation. Radio Graphics 2003. [Google Scholar]
- A A Alduaij, M B Resnick, M Kawata, V E Pricolo. Metastatic malignant melanoma presenting as an appendiceal. J Oncol 2011. [Google Scholar]
- D K Driman, D E Melega, G A Vilos, E A Plewes. Mucocele of the appendix secondary to endometriosis: report Case Reports in Oncological Medicine 5 of two cases, one with localized pseudomyxoma peritonei,. Am J Clin Pathol 2000. [Google Scholar]
- R K Pai, T A Longacre. Appendiceal mucinous tumors and pseudomyxoma peritonei: histologic features, diagnostic problems, and proposed classification. Adv Anat Pathol 2005. [Google Scholar]
- R K Pai, A H Beck, J A Norton, T A Longacre. Appendiceal mucinousneoplasms: clinicopathologic study of 116 cases with analysis of factors predicting recurrence. Am J Surg Pathol 2009. [Google Scholar]
- J Misdraji. Appendiceal mucinous neoplasms: controversialissues. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2010. [Google Scholar]
- N J Carr, W F Mccarthy, L H Sobin. Epithelial noncarcinoid tumors and tumor-like lesions of the appendix. A clinicopathologic study of 184 patients with a multivariate analysis of prognostic factors. Cancer 1995. [Google Scholar]
- S H Tirumania, M F Hill, R Auer. Mucinous neoplasms of the appendix: a current comprehensive clinicopathologic and imaging review. Cancer Imaging 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Samy S. Nitecki, Bruce G. Wolff, Richard Schlinkert, Michael G. Sarr. The Natural History of Surgically Treated Primary Adenocarcinoma of the Appendix. Ann Surg 1994. [Google Scholar]
- M A Cerame. A 25-year review of adenocarcinoma ofthe appendix. A frequently perforating carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 1988. [Google Scholar]
- F Morano, Gleeson. Clinicopathological features and management of appendiceal mucoceles;a systamic review. Am surg 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Abdelkarim H Omari, Muhammad R Khammash, Ghazi R Qasaimeh, Ahmad K Shammari, Mohammad K Bani Yaseen, Sahel K Hammori. Acute appendicitis in the elderly: risk factors for perforation. World J Emerg Surg 2014. [Google Scholar]
- A Emre, M Sertkaya, I Taner Kale. Clinicopathological analysis of appendiceal mucinous tumors: A single-center experience. Turk J Surg 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Murat Ozgur Kilic, Aydin Inan, Mikdat Bozer. Four mucinous cystadenoma of the appendix treated by different approaches. Turk J Surg 2014. [Google Scholar]
- F U Malya, M Hasbahceci, A Serter, G Cipe, O Karatepe, E Kocakoc. Appendiceal mucocele: clinical and imaging features of 14cases. Chirurgia (Bucur) 2014. [Google Scholar]
- L Stocchi, B G Wolff, D R Larson, J R Harrington. Surgical Treatment ofAppendiceal Mucocele. Arch Surg 2003. [Google Scholar]
- V Ramaswamy. Pathology of mucinous appendiceal tumors and pseudomyxoma peritonei. Indian J Surg Oncol 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Vennila Padmanaban, William F. Morano, Elizabeth Gleeson, Anshu Aggarwal, Beth L. Mapow, David E. Stein. Incidentally discovered low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm: a precursor to pseudomyxoma peritonei. Clin Case Rep 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Joseph Misdraji, Robert H. Young. Primary epithelial neoplasms and other epithelial lesions of the appendix (excluding carcinoid tumors). Seminars Diagn Pathol 2004. [Google Scholar]
- K J Kelly. Management of appendix cancer. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2015. [Google Scholar]
- D C Collins. Adenomatous polyps of the vermiform appendix. Surg Clin North Am 1932. [Google Scholar]
- G M Proulx, C G Willett, Daleyw. Appendiceal carcinoma:patterns of failure following surgery and implications for adjuvant therapy. J Surg Oncol 1997. [Google Scholar]