- Visibility 394 Views
- Downloads 43 Downloads
- Permissions
- DOI 10.18231/j.achr.2022.033
-
CrossMark
Dear Researchers,
Authorship is defined as the one who an idea or who starts a plan or one who begins or create that means the principal investigator.[1], [2], [3] For academic and research purposes, an authorship means the one who has made substantive intellectual contributions to the published study. [4] Giving credit to someone who is not contributed or qualified as an author or not giving credit or remove / depriving a deserving authorship credit are grave ethical concern and serious issues. [3]
Authorship of manuscript suggested that the authors should be credited with creation of new knowledge, giving new solution or proving new insights in research which may add up to existing literature.[3] Its beneficial for promotions in their respective fields and to earn credit points in performance appraisals or for various grants in research. [3] It brings recognition from peer groups and experts in the respective field throughout the world. [3]
Professional misconduct or malpractices are there in the authorships also. Due to ‘Publish and Perish’ nature and competitive behavior, it is flourished now days.
Ghost Authorship
Ghost authorship is exactly opposite to the gift/guest or honorary authorships. [5] Ghost authors of mainly 3 types. Ghost authors are defined as those one entailing a significant contribution to a manuscript without acknowledgement of that contribution. [5] These authors can do all the data analysis, writing the manuscript but their names are not named or not disclosed in author list or in acknowledgment. [3]
First form of ghost authorship is suppression of the contribution of junior colleges, usually post graduates or junior researchers or postdoctoral fellow. They perform all the task like drafting the manuscript and carried the research, their name are missing from the authorship list. [3]
Second form is one wherein an individual not connected with the research study writes the first draft, works as authors personal editor and provides better quality manuscript and saves authors time. [3]
Third type of ghost authorship is most dangerous form. In this ‘professional medical writer’ (appointed by pharmaceutical company or device company/industry researcher) writes the draft which is approved by company but is not credited for this work. [5]
Gift or Honorary Authorship
Gift or guest or honorary authorship occurs when someone is credited as an author, taking acknowledgement for a research paper when, in fact, he/she hasn’t really given any contribution for it whatsoever. Sadly, this is a very common type of unethical behavior, quite unacceptable in the eyes of most medical editors. [4] Its mainly done by the authors to increase the chance of acceptance of the article to reputed journals by enhancing their prestige. [3], [4], [5], [6] The difference between guest authorship and honorary or gift authorship is marginal, such communication will include guest and gift authorship under honorary authorship by Bavdekar SB. [3] Prevalence of guest/ honorary authorship is more than 50 % as per survey over the years. [3] Most commonly it is gifted to lower academic rank colleagues or who has nil publications in few years ,to the departmental head or who required it for promotions. [3]
Committee of publication ethics (COPE) and the World Association of Medical Editors (WAME) have published explicit statements against ghost authorship. Several of their recommended methods to combat both ghost and guest authorship are as follows: [4]
Journals should set clear authorship criteria.
Authors should disclose all contributors, regardless of author status, and their specific individual contributions and affiliations.
Authors should sign a formal declaration about their contributions.
Authors should complete a checklist if they received help from a medical writer.
The various methods and guidelines are adopted by medical journal to discourage the practice of ghost or guest authorships as per COPE, WAME and ICMJE. It is nicely explained by glow chart of COPE. [6], [7]
Advice to the authors –Kindly go through the “author guidelines” and follow it. Carefully read the “Instructions to author”.
Conflict of Interest
None.
References
- . Cambridge dictionaries online. [accessed on 21/9/2022]. . . [Google Scholar]
- . Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English. [accessed on 21/9/2022]. . . [Google Scholar]
- Bavdekar S. Authorship issues. Lung India. 2012;29(1):76-80. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Panter M. Ghost authorship. [accessed on 21/9/2022]. . . [Google Scholar]
- . International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE). [accessed on 21/9/2022]. Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: Ethical Considerations in the Conduct and Reporting of Research: Authorship and Contributorship. . . [Google Scholar]
- . COPE Council. COPE Flowcharts and infographics — How to recognise potential authorship problems — English. [accessed on 21/9/2022]. . . [Google Scholar]
- Marušić A, Bates T, Anić A. How the structure of contribution disclosure statements affects validity of authorship: a randomised study in a general medical journal. Curr Med Res Opin. 2006;22(6):1035-44. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]