Print ISSN: 2581-5725
Online ISSN: 2456-9267
CODEN : IACHCL
IP Archives of Cytology and Histopathology Research (ACHR) open access, peer-reviewed quarterly journal publishing since 2016 and is published under the Khyati Education and Research Foundation (KERF), is registered as a non-profit society (under the society registration act, 1860), Government of India with the vision of various accredited vocational courses in healthcare, education, paramedical, yoga, publication, teaching and research activity, with the aim of faster and better dissemination of knowledge, we will be publishing the article more...Original Article
Author Details :
Volume : 4, Issue : 2, Year : 2019
Article Page : 168-172
https://doi.org/10.18231/j.achr.2019.032
Abstract
Aims and Objective: Decalcification of hard tissues specimens for the purpose of histopathological examination is often a time-consuming process and lead to undue delay in diagnosis. As a part of search for an ideal decalcifying agent, we designed the present study to compare two commercial decalcifying agents with 5% nitric acid
Materials and Methods: Size matched bone specimens from human mandible were decalcified, using 5% Nitric acid, commercial decalcifying agents: Product A and Product B (n=22 each). Decalcified specimens were processed, sectioned, stained with H&E stain and evaluated for different parameters such as microtomy, staining quality, structural integrity, preservation of cellularity and cellular and nuclear details. The results were compared between the groups using Krunskal Wallis test and Mann-Whitney U test.
Results: 5% Nitric acid is found to be significantly better in terms of microtomy, staining characteristics and structural integrity with p-value being 0.002, 0.005 and 0.004 respectively when compared to Product A. Similarly microtomy, staining characteristics and preservation of cellularity were noted to be superior with 5% Nitric acid in comparison with Product B, with p-value of 0.004, 0.001 and 0.019 respectively. None of the assessed parameters showed significant difference between Product A and Product B groups.
Conclusion: We found 5% nitric acid to be a better decalcifying agent compared to the commercial decalcifying agents used in this study. When time is a constrain, Product A i.e Osteomoll is a good choice, as the process of decalcification is faster without compromising the quality to a great extent.
Keywords: Decalcification, 5% Nitric acid, Commercial decalcifying agents.
How to cite : Hariz R, Jose M, Adyanthaya S, Evaluation of efficacy of commercially available decalcifying agents. IP Arch Cytol Histopathol Res 2019;4(2):168-172
This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.