IP Archives of Cytology and Histopathology Research

Print ISSN: 2581-5725

Online ISSN: 2456-9267

CODEN : IACHCL

IP Archives of Cytology and Histopathology Research (ACHR) open access, peer-reviewed quarterly journal publishing since 2016 and is published under the Khyati Education and Research Foundation (KERF), is registered as a non-profit society (under the society registration act, 1860), Government of India with the vision of various accredited vocational courses in healthcare, education, paramedical, yoga, publication, teaching and research activity, with the aim of faster and better dissemination of knowledge, we will be publishing the article more...

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article statistics

Viewed: 835

PDF Downloaded: 495


Get Permission Pujitha, Das, and Sheela S. R: A study to detect preinvasive and invasive cancer


Introduction

Carcinoma cervix is the most common genital tract cancer encountered in developing countries accounting for 80% of world cases, 18% are from India.1 Every year in India, 1,22,844 are diagnosed with diagnosed with cervical cancer and 67477 die from the disease.2 2 India has a population of 432.2 million women aged 15 years and older who are at a risk of developing cancer.Incidence rates vary from 0.1 to 12 per 10000 pregnancies.3 Cervical cancer is the most common malignancy diagnosed during pregnancy comprising about 70%.

Risk factors for cervical cancers includes 1) women with low socio-economic status 2) Sexually active at a younger age 3) Multiple sexual partners 4) Poor genital hygiene 5) Use of oral contraceptives.4 Cervical cancer screening programmes implemented on developed countries over the past fifty years have significantly contributed to the reduction of cancer cervix related deaths. However, high incidence and mortality rates continue in developing counties due to the lack of screening programmes. In rural India, pregnancy and a request for antenatal care may be the only reason for a woman to consult a health professional. Most cervical abnormalities in pregnancy are discovered as a result of routine screening at the initiation of prenatal care.5

Hence screening by PAP smear during pregnancy useful to screen more number of women in reproduction age group, offers unique and efficient way to detect early cervical changes and hence take timely action.6 Even though PAP smear and its efficacy as a screening aid for cervical cancer has been extensively studies over decades, studies which are done during pregnancy are not many.

Aims and Objectives

  1. To screen pregnant women for pre invasive lesions of cervix using PAP smear.

  2. To know the prevalence of cervical lesions during pregnancy in rural population of Kolar.

Materials and Methods

A study of 137 antenatal women. Antenatal women of 14 weeks to 40 weeks of gestational age attending outpatient department for antenatal care in our institution during the study period. General clinical examination and complete obstetric examination were done. Necessary investigations such as PAP smear was taken from the squamocolumnar junction of cervix, after obtaining an informed consent. Sample smeared eventually on the slide and fixed immediately with cytofix spray to avoid air dry. Sample is stained using the PAP stain. Excess of dye is washed under water at slow stream. PAP smears was reported as per modified Bethesda Classification (2014) and reporting was given as normal smear, inflammatory smear, ASC-US, ASC-H or LSIL, HSIL & AGC.

Exclusion criteria includes a) those pregnant women who have been previously diagnosed with cervical pathology, b) unexplained vaginal bleeding, c) active labor with premature rupture of membranes and e) h aving history of recent coitus or using any vaginal medications.

Statistical Analysis

Data was entered into Microsoft excel data sheet and was analyzed using SPSS 22 version software. Categorical data was represented in the form of frequencies and proportions. Chi-square was used as a test of significance. Continuous data was represent as mean and standard derivation. P value <0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Results

Table 1 shows distribution of cases according to knowledge of PAP smears - 37.9% of the cases were not aware of routine and evidenced base screening for cervical cancer. They were unwilling for pap smear to be done, as they were concerned about well being of the fetus.

Table 2 shows distribution of cases according to Academic Qualification - 45.3% of the study subjects were uneducated and 31.4% of the women received education up to primary school followed by secondary school education (11.7%) and 11.7% were graduates. Women who were graduated were aware of screening tests for cancer cervix.

Table 3 shows distribution of cases according to occupation - 62% of study subjects were agricultural workers followed by home makers (24.8%), 9.5% were in construction job and 2.2% were teachers and 1.5% were tailors with limited knowledge about PAP smear and cervical cancers.

Table 4 shows distribution of cases according to socioeconomic status - 56.2% belonged to lower socio-economic status as they constituted 77 of the total 137 subjects.

Table 5 shows distribution of cases according to age of marriage - 88(64.2%) of the women were married at the age of 19-21 years and 24.1% women were married at 16-18 years of age.

Table 6 shows distribution of cases according to prior contracepetion use – 52.6% of subjects were not using contraception and 24.1% were using barrier method for contraception.

Table 7 shows appearance of cervix on speculum examination - Our group no growth were seen on vaginal examination of cervix. 85.45% having healthy cervix and vagina .. 5.1% having minimal white discharge and curdy white discharge present in 6.6% cases. Erosion was seen in 2.9% of the cases.

Table 8 shows distribution of cases according to cytology report- 75.2% of the patients are having normal smear and were 34 women had inflammation (24.8%). None of the women showed abnormal smears in our study.

Table 9 shows distribution of smears in primigravida and multigravida – 44.7% of primigravida and 55.3% of multigravida have normal smears. 58.8% of primigravida and 41.2% of multigravida have inflammatory smears. No malignant smears were detected.

Table 1
Knowledge No of cases Percentage
Aware 44 32.1%
Not aware 93 67.9%
Total 137 100%

Distribution of cases according to knowledge of pap smears

Table 2
Education No of cases Percentage
Uneducated 62 45.3%
Primary 43 31.4%
Secondary 16 11.7%
Graduate 16 11.7%
Total 137 100%

Distribution of cases according to education

Table 3
Occupation No of cases Percentage
Agriculture 85 62%
Home maker 34 24.8%
Constructional workers 13 9.5%
Tailor 2 1.5%
Teacher 3 2.2%
Total 137 100%

Distribution of cases according to education

Table 4
Socioeconomic status No of cases Percentage
Lower class 77 56.2%
Lower-middle class 21 15.3%
Middle class 19 13.9%
Upper class 15 11.7%
Upper middle class 4 2.9%
Total 137 100%

Distribution of cases according to socioeconomic status

Table 5
Age (years) No of cases Percentage
16-18 33 24.1%
19-21 88 64.2%
22-24 13 9.5%
25-27 3 2.2%
Total 137 100%

Distribution of cases according to age at marriage

Table 6
Contraception No of cases Percentage
None 72 52.6%
Barrier 33 24.1%
IUCD 17 12.4%
OCP 15 10.9%
Total 137 100%

Distribution of cases according to prior contraception use

Table 7
Per speculum examination No. of cases Percentage
Cervix vagina healthy, curdy white discharge present 9 6.6%
Cervix and vagina healthy, minimal white discharge present 7 5.1%
Erosion 4 2.9%
Cervix and vaginal healthy 117 85.4%
Total 137 100%

Appearance of cervix on speculum examination

Table 8
Cytology report No. of cases Percentage
NILM 103 75.2%
NILM with inflammatory smear 34 24.8%
Total 137 100%

Distribution of cases according to cytology report

Table 9
Parity Cytology Report Total
NILM NILM with inflammatory smear
Primi 46 20 66
Multi 57 14 71
Total 103 34 137
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Distribution of smears in primigravida and multigravida

Discussion

Cancer cervix is both preventable and curable disease. It is preventable by cervical screening and curable if identified at an early stage.7 Screening cytology and early treatment constitute the sheet anchor of control of the disease. It is the third most common type of gynecological cancer in women world wide. It accounts for 15% of all malignancies in developing countries where women do not have access to cervical cancer screening and prevention programs it remains the second most common type of cancer.8

Indian contribution to cervical cases and mortality is 25.4% and 26.5% respectively. Majority of Indian women diagnosed with this disease have never been screened for this condition. Around 70% present in advanced stages due to absence of an organized cancer screening programme.

According to National Cancer Institute, strong risk factors include early age at first intercourse, history of multiple sexual partners, genital human papilloma virus infection (HPV) or other sexual transmitted disease (STD), and the presence or history of other genital tract abnormalities. One reason that many of these women do not get screened for cervical cancer is that they often don’t view themselves as being at risk.9 Available literature shows that women often participate in cervical cancer screening less regularly, leading to lesion that are found in more advanced are less curable stage. Many women do not want to discuss sexual issues due to embarrassment despite appropriate counseling. About 24.1% (33 of 137 women) of the women had early marriages.10

In our study the awareness of PAP smear is 32.1% whereas the study conducted by Manikkam B,8 TamilNadu, awareness was 80.5%. Since ours is a tertiary rural care centre, the awareness of people residing in Kolar regarding PAP smear was less accounting for 32.1%.

In our study 24.8% showed inflammatory smear on cytological evaluation. All these women were further evaluated and treated appropriately. Even though most of the women has strong risk factors like low socioeconomic status uneducated, early marriages, none of the women showed abnormal smears in this study, could be due to most of the subjects were married above 18 years of age delaying their sexual debut, and majority of the cases were nullipara or primipara.

To screen women between ages of 35-64 at 10 years interval with the present resources. PAP smear testing units have been established under the post partum programme in some selected medical colleges. Analysis of the data from these shows that the large number of women visiting the post partum units are young & less than 30 years of age.

The PAP smear test is the only screening test for cancer in the world, which had caused a decrease in occurrence and death from cancer. A Pap smear is a screening tool, not a diagnostic test, further evaluation is required when abnormal changes are detected. PAP smear is one of the cervical screening methods which is convenient, economical, painless, sensitive and widely accepted.

Conclusion

Carcinoma cervix is one of the deadly cause of mortality due to gynaecological cancer in India.10 The aim of our study was to detect pre-invasive and invasive lesions of the cervix in woman who came for antenatal checkup. Even though there were no positive smears, 34 smeared patients had inflammatory smear.1 Those detected to have inflammatory smears were treated appropriately. This interaction with patient sensitized them to the need for cervical cancer screening in future.8 As our institute mainly caters to the rural population most of the female patients are from the remote and far-flung areas who seek medical care only during delivery and hence educating and creating awareness regarding cervical cancer screening among the rural population during pregnancy is highly essential and beneficial for a healthy and prosperous socio economic development of the community at large.

Acknowledgement

The author sincerely acknowledges the help rendered by Mrs. Sarala and Dr. Princy. S. Soman during the preparation of the manuscript.

Source of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1 

Epidemiology of cervical cancer with special focus on IndiaInt J women health20157405414

2 

K Canfell F Sitas V Beral Cervical cancer in Australia and the United Kingdom: comparision of screening policy and uptake, and cancer incidence and mortalityMed J Aus2006185482486

3 

S Eaker H O Adami P Sparen Reasons women do not attend screening for cervical cancer: a population-based study in SwedenJ Prev Med200132482491

4 

A Berrington De Gonzalez S Swetland J Green Comparison of risk factors for squamous cell and adenocarcinomas of the cervix. A meta-analysisBr J Cancer20049017871804

5 

A Dinc Pap smear screening results for Turkish pregnant womenAsian Pac J Cancer Prev20121358355838

6 

P Singh V Baghel Screening of pregnant women for cervical malignanciesInt J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol20132359362

7 

S Mariusz K Anna G Anna Jozefiak The prevalence of Human Papillomavirus between the neonatas and their mothersBio Med Res Int201512641716

8 

B Manikkam Int J Community Med Public Health 2016324932517

9 

K Suzuki M Furuhashi T Kawamura K Kubo T Yamawaki Comparing Papanicolaous test results obtained d uring pregnancy and post-partumJ Obstet Gynaecol Res201743705709

10 

B D Weiss J H Senf W Udall The postpartum Papanicolaous smearJ Am Broad Fam Pract1989249



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Article type

Original Article


Article page

324-327


Authors Details

Kurra Sai Pujitha, Subhashish Das, Sheela S. R


Article Metrics


View Article As

 


Downlaod Files